I opened the New York Times this morning, as I do most days, to catch up on the news. As I paged through the sections, a headline caught my eye: Chicago Sun-Times Lays Off All Its Full-Time Photographers.
I had to read it twice. Could this really be true? As I delved into the article, I realized, sadly, that it most certainly was. Even a Pulitzer prize-winning photographer wasn’t immune from these inane budget cuts.
Upon further research, I discovered that newspaper leaders plan to use more freelancers and train their reporters to use iPhones in the field to replace the professional photographers’ images. Yes, they are serious.
After digesting this information today as I was on deadline writing and editing articles and photographs for the magazine I produce, I realized the Sun-Times announcement is yet another nail in the coffin for professional photographers and an exclamation point on the “good enough” factor. I don’t want to settle for good enough, and I know I’m not alone.
In fact, for this particular issue of the magazine, I’ve worked closely with two veteran professional photographers whose stellar images have made very good, well-written articles into vibrant features that are beautiful on the page. I see their eye-catching images stopping the readers and drawing them into the articles. “Good enough” photos won’t do that. The Sun-Times decision is not only a lose-lose for the photographer and the media, but also, more importantly, a loss for our society, culture and history.
Words on a page can only take us so far. Images convey unique moments in time. We rely on the talents of professional photographers to show us the world, to allow the observer to draw his own conclusion with images taken at the perfect time, in the ideal light and with instinctive creativity only developed after many years of experience.
I admit I’m a hypocrite. I’m one of those reporters who writes and takes photographs. Some may say I was ahead of the times, but I think not. I’m simply a photographer who added writing to my skill set to further express myself. There’s a huge difference between choosing to become a professional photographer and having an iPhone shoved into your hands.
I’ve seen the world through the viewfinder of a camera since childhood, and I spent a decade in the darkroom, years in front of the computer and out in the field taking workshops to further develop my skills in an ever-changing technological world. Being a professional photographer today is a never-ending educational process; once you learn to type, you’re a writer (Editor’s note: OK, that’s a bit simplistic, but you get the idea).
To think that important, newsworthy events in a major city the size of Chicago will now be covered with images taken as a sidebar–using snapshots captured with a writer’s iPhone–is a travesty to photojournalism.
When you think back to iconic moments in history, such as man walking on the moon, the assassination of President Kennedy, Woodstock, 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, what do you remember? It’s not the articles written or the quotes from TV interviews—it’s the photographs. It’s those amazing images taken by professional photographers that became synonymous with the event, the pictures that remain vibrant in our minds when the words and details we’ve read have long since faded on the pages and from our memories.
I wish those former Chicago Sun-Times photographers the best of luck in their future endeavors, and I hope that they land in a place where their talents are recognized and cherished.
I hope laid off photographers will be WELL PAID for their free lance work!!!
We can only hope!
Unbelievable. Another nail in the professional photographers coffin. Here is an interesting post from a fellow blogger. I think this is rather timely. http://jeffsinonphotography.wordpress.com/2013/05/25/photo-credit-is-worthless/
Excellent post Tricia.
Thanks for the link, David. I’ve spent some time reading various articles and blogs in the aftermath of this event. They certainly give much food for thought about the future of photography and journalism. It’s certainly not a time to sit static and wait; most of the successful people seem to be making changes to their business models and looking for new avenues of revenue. It will be interesting to see where it all ends up.
That’s a bit of shock, but somehow it doesn’t surprise me all that much. The Sun-Times must’ve accepted the premise that a digital camera has made photography so easy that a professional is no longer needed.
Yes, I think we’re seeing many aspects of this mind-set more and more throughout the industry. Maybe to a degree there’s some truth to it. It’s just hard to swallow!
Wow! That is crazy news and agree it will impact the quality of the stories. Of course lots of small town papers have gotten rid of some of their writers too.
Certainly, I’ve seen evidence of this in my own industry, too. My community paper died and is now only a shell of its former self on the Internet. Interestingly, a new “magazine” has emerged to take its place. Monthly but better than nothing!
Pingback: A Sad Day in Photography | Tricia Booker Photography | ELLIOT PAUL STERN
Yes, I saw the same article, and have been mourning the loss. Yes, it’s a SAD, SAD commentary on the effects of progress through technology and rising costs of print material. Let’s hold on tight to the National Geographic.
I am a long-time subscriber to NatGeo. I actually have more than a dozen magazine subscriptions going. I try and support my industry and even have a paid subscription to two newspapers. No, I don’t have time to read them all every day/week. But I enjoy seeing them arrive in my mailbox and knowing that I’m contributing to their survival.
I’m from Chicago, and although I have never aspired to be a photograph, I think this is a terrible attitude to have and seem to echo your sentiments exactly! Next they’ll fire the writers in exchange for bloggers…..Good luck
So true! It’s a shame that a great city like Chicago should see the demise of one of their best papers. It will be interesting to see the reactions from the subscribers and if there’s any feedback. I hope someone notices the difference in quality!
I thought the same thing Tricia. Love that you posted about it!